Quiero saber acerca de...

48396

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 165 / Monday, August 30, 2021 / Notices
Co., Ltd.
14. Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
15. Yingli Green Energy International Trading Company Limited No-Reviewable Entries:
16. BYD Shangluo Industrial Co., Ltd.
17. Canadian Solar Manufacturing Changshu Inc.
18. Canadian Solar Manufacturing Luoyang Inc.
19. De-Tech Trading Limited HK
20. Dongguan Sunworth Solar Energy Co., Ltd.
21. Eoplly New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.
22. ERA Solar Co., Ltd.
23. ET Solar Energy Limited 24. Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd.
25. Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd.
26. Jiangsu High Hope Intl Group 27. Jinko Solar International Limited 28. LERRI Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
29. Light Way Green New Energy Co., Ltd.
30. Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd.
31. Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd.
32. Sumec Hardware & Tools Co., Ltd.
33. Sunpreme Solar Technology Jiaxing Co., Ltd.
34. Systemes Versilis, Inc.
35. tenKsolar Shanghai Co., Ltd.
36. Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.
37. Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd.
38. Zhejiang ERA Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
39. Zhejiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.
40. Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology Limited Liability Company FR Doc. 202118598 Filed 82721; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 3510DSP

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration C122858

Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Results of Countervailing Duty Expedited Review; Notice of Rescission of Final Results of Expedited Review; Notice of Amended Cash Deposit Rates Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES

AGENCY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:40 Aug 27, 2021

Jkt 253001

On August 18, 2021, the U.S.
Court of International Trade CIT
issued its final judgment in Committee Overseeing Action for Lumber International Trade Investigations or Negotiations, et al. v. United States, et al., Consol. Court No. 1900122, sustaining the Department of Commerces Commerce remand results pertaining to the expedited review of the countervailing duty CVD order on certain softwood lumber products softwood lumber from Canada covering the period January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015. Commerce is notifying the public that the CITs final judgment is not in harmony with Commerces final results of the expedited review, and that Commerce is rescinding the final results; reinstating the CVD order for Les Produits Forestiers D&G Ltee D&G, Marcel Lauzon Inc. MLI, North American Forest Products Ltd. NAFB located in New Brunswick, Roland Boulanger &
Cie Ltee Roland, and Scierie Alexandre Lemay & Fils Inc. Lemay including their cross-owned affiliates;
and reassigning the cash deposit rate for the companies covered by the Final Results of Expedited Review.
DATES: Applicable August 28, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristen Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202 4824793.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:

Background On January 3, 2018, Commerce published the CVD order on softwood lumber from Canada.1 On July 5, 2019, Commerce published its Final Results of Expedited Review for the CVD Order.2
1 See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 347 January 3, 2018 CVD Order.
2 See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Expedited Review, 84 FR 32121 July 5, 2019 Final Results of Expedited Review, and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum IDM.

PO 00000

Frm 00012

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

In the Final Results of Expedited Review, Commerce stated that it promulgated 19 CFR 351.214k, its regulations for conducting CVD
expedited reviews, pursuant to section 103a of the Uruguay Round of Agreements Act URAA, which made several amendments to the antidumping and CVD provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended the Act.3
Specifically, Commerce explained that Article 19.3 of the World Trade Organization Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures SCM
Agreement expressly provides for expedited reviews of non-investigated exporters or producers in CVD
proceedings and that the Statement of Administrative Action SAA states that Article 19.3 of the Subsidies Agreement provides that any exporter whose exports are subject to a CVD
order, but which was not actually investigated for reasons other than a refusal to cooperate, shall be entitled to an expedited review to establish an individual CVD rate for that exporter. 4
Although the URAA did not implement a specific provision for the conduct of CVD expedited reviews in the Act, Commerce concluded that it had the authority to promulgate the CVD
expedited review regulations at 19 CFR
351.214k pursuant to section 103a of the URAA, which provides that appropriate officers of the United States Government may issue such regulations, as may be necessary to ensure that any provision of this Act, or amendment made by this Act, . . . is appropriately implemented . . . . 5
3 See Final Results of Expedited Review IDM at 19
citing URAA, Pub. L. 103465, 108 Stat. 4809
1994.
4 Id. at 18 citing SAA H.R. Doc. 103316, Vol. I
at 870 1994, reprinted at 1994 U.S.C.C.A.N. 4040, 4199, at 941. Section 102d of the URAA states that the SAA shall be regarded as an authoritative expression by the United States concerning the interpretation and application of the Uruguay Round Agreements and this Act in any judicial proceeding in which a question arises concerning such interpretation or application.
5 See Final Results of Expedited Review IDM at 19
citing section 103a of the URAA.

E:FRFM30AUN1.SGM

30AUN1