Quiero saber acerca de...

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 154 / Friday, August 13, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 7. In 275.13 amend paragraph f by:
a. Revising the paragraph heading;
and b. Removing the last sentence.
The revision reads as follows:

275.13

Review of negative cases.

f Demonstration projects.

8. In 275.21:
a. Revise paragraph b; and b. In paragraph d:
i. Revise the paragraph heading; and ii. Removing the phrase /SSA
processed cases from the first sentence.
The revisions read as follows:

275.21

Quality control review reports.

b Individual cases. The State agency shall report the review findings on each case selected for review during the sample month. For active cases, the State agency shall thoroughly document the Quality Control Review Schedule, Form FNS380, to ensure any subsequent case reviewers fully understand household circumstances pertaining to the QC review as well as the reasons for the individual case finding and disposition. The State agency shall also code the findings on the Form FNS3801. For negative cases, the State agency shall submit a summary report, coded and documented on the Negative Quality Control Review Schedule, Form FNS245, in enough detail to ensure subsequent case reviewers fully understand the reasons for the individual finding and disposition. The review findings shall be reported as follows:

d Demonstration projects.
9. In 275.23 amend paragraph b1
by:
a. Revising the paragraph heading;
and b. Removing the second and third sentences of the paragraph.
The revision reads as follows:

275.23 Determination of State agency program performance.

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES

b
1 Demonstration projects.

Stacy Dean, Deputy Under Secretary, Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services.
FR Doc. 202117254 Filed 81221; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 341030P

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:00 Aug 12, 2021

Jkt 253001

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service 7 CFR Part 985
Doc. No. AMSSC200087; SC219851
FR

Marketing Order Regulating the Handling of Spearmint Oil Produced in the Far West; Salable Quantities and Allotment Percentages for the 2021
2022 Marketing Year Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: This rule implements a recommendation from the Far West Spearmint Oil Administrative Committee to establish salable quantities and allotment percentages for Class 1 Scotch and Class 3 Native spearmint oil produced in Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and designated parts of Nevada and Utah the Far West for the 20212022 marketing year.
DATES: Effective September 13, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua R. Wilde, Marketing Specialist, or Gary Olson, Regional Director, Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: 503 326
2724, or Email: Joshua.R.Wilde@
usda.gov or GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 202500237; Telephone: 202 720
2491, Fax: 202 7208938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, amends regulations issued to carry out a marketing order as defined in 7 CFR
900.2j. This rule is issued under Marketing Order No. 985, as amended 7
CFR part 985, regulating the handling of spearmint oil produced in the Far West. Part 985 referred to as the Order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended 7 U.S.C. 601674, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The Far West Spearmint Oil Administrative Committee Committee locally administers the Order and is comprised of spearmint oil producers operating within the area of production, and a public member.
The Department of Agriculture USDA is issuing this final rule in
PO 00000

Frm 00015

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

44587

conformance with Executive Orders 12866 and 13563. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts and equity.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. This action falls within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management and Budget OMB exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13175
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, which requires agencies to consider whether their rulemaking actions would have tribal implications. AMS has determined this final rule is unlikely to have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect. Under the Order now in effect, salable quantities and allotment percentages may be established for classes of spearmint oil produced in the Far West. This rule establishes quantities and allotment percentages for Scotch and Native spearmint oil for the 20212022
marketing year, which begins on June 1, 2021.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c15A of the Act, any handler subject to a marketing order may file with USDA a petition stating that the marketing order, any provision of the marketing order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the marketing order is not in accordance with law and request a modification of the marketing order or to be exempted therefrom. Such a handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDAs ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed
E:FRFM13AUR1.SGM

13AUR1