Federal Register - August 5, 2021

Versión en texto ¿Qué es?Dateas es un sitio independiente no afiliado a entidades gubernamentales. La fuente de los documentos PDF aquí publicados es la entidad gubernamental indicada en cada uno de ellos. Las versiones en texto son transcripciones no oficiales que realizamos para facilitar el acceso y la búsqueda de información, pero pueden contener errores o no estar completas.

Fuente: Federal Register

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 148 / Thursday, August 5, 2021 / Proposed Rules jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment see ADDRESSES explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213a of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 Pub. L. 104121, we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule affects your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS

C. Collection of Information This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 44
U.S.C. 35013520.
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175 Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 2 U.S.C. 15311538 requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In
VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:19 Aug 04, 2021

Jkt 253001

particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 adjusted for inflation or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment We analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 02301, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 series, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 42
U.S.C. 43214370f, and made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves 6 safety zones that will be activated for the duration of the HRBT
Expansion Project. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60a of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 0230100101, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, and will consider all comments and material received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation.

PO 00000

Frm 00014

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

42761

We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https
www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted using https
www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted without change to https
www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions in response to this document, see DHSs Correspondence System of Records notice 84 FR 48645, September 26, 2018.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that websites instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a final rule is published.
Prior to this notice, HRCP conducted several maritime community outreach meetings, with the most recent being held virtually on May 6th, 7th, and 8th, 2020 as announced by public website postings and electronic mailing list distributions, and email. No further public meetings are anticipated at this time. Any public meetings held to discuss this rulemaking would be hosted in-person, virtually, or a combination thereof, and would be announced by website postings and emailed announcements. For information on facilities or services for individuals with disabilities or to request special assistance, call or email the person named in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section, above.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation water, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:

Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.051, 6.041, 6.046, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

2. Add 165.519 to read as follows:

E:FRFM05AUP1.SGM

05AUP1

Acerca de esta edición

Federal Register - August 5, 2021

TítuloFederal Register

PaísEstados Unidos de América

Fecha05/08/2021

Nro. de páginas404

Nro. de ediciones7800

Primera edición14/03/1936

Ultima edición23/06/2026

Descargar esta edición

Otras ediciones

<<<Agosto 2021>>>
DLMMJVS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031