Federal Register - August 4, 2021

Versión en texto ¿Qué es?Dateas es un sitio independiente no afiliado a entidades gubernamentales. La fuente de los documentos PDF aquí publicados es la entidad gubernamental indicada en cada uno de ellos. Las versiones en texto son transcripciones no oficiales que realizamos para facilitar el acceso y la búsqueda de información, pero pueden contener errores o no estar completas.

Fuente: Federal Register

42580

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 147 / Wednesday, August 4, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 14: Reportability: Percent of Providers Meeting Measure Public R eporfmg Th res h 0 Id s Reportability Standard Public Reuorting SPR
Met threshold % Providers
COVID-19 Affected Reuorting CAR
Met Threshold % Providers
Measure
HIS Comprehensive Assessment Measure
4,078 89.1%

3,842 83.9%

Table 14 indicates that the reliability of the HIS Comprehensive Assessment Measure scores is similar for the CAR
and SPR scenarios. Testing also yielded correlation coefficients above 0.9, indicating a high degree of agreement between hospices HIS Comprehensive Assessment Measure scores when using
Difference CAR-SPR

3 or 4 quarters of data. The results also show that th e HIS Comprehensive Assessment Measures ICC for CAR and SPR scenarios are similar, with only a 0.02 difference. This implies high internal reliability of the measure in both scenarios. The median reliability scores for the HIS Comprehensive
-236 -5.2%

Assessment Measure are also very similar in both CAR and SPR scenarios.
This indicates that scores estimated using 3 quarters of data continue to capture provider-level differences and that admission-level scores remain consistent within hospices.

TABLE 15: Reliability: Correlations, Split-Half Testing, and Reliability Score for COVID-19 Affected CAR and Standard Public Reporting SPR
Scenarios Correlation between CAR and SPR
Measure
Pearson
Spearman
HIS
Comprehensive 0.98
0.96
Assessment Measure ICC = Intra-class Coefficient In Table 15, we explore changes in hospices relative rankings between the SPR and CAR scenarios. For each scenario, we divided hospices in quintiles based on their HIS
Comprehensive Assessment Measure
Split-Half Testin2:

Reliability Reliability Score
ICC
CAR

ICC
SPR

Difference CARSPR

Median Score CAR

Median Score SPR

Difference CARSPR

0.95

0.93

0.02

97.5

97.7

-0.2

score, such that higher scores are in a higher quintile. Changes in a hospices quintile from the SPR to CAR scenario would indicate a re-ranking of hospices when using 3 quarters compared to 4
quarters. Over 93 percent of hospices
remain in the same quintile, suggesting that the ranking of hospices is fairly stable between the SPR and CAR
scenarios.

Urban Providers
Measure
%Same Quintile
% CAR
Lower Quintile
% CAR
Higher Quintile
% Same Quintile
% CAR
Lower Quintile
% CAR
Higher Quintile
%Same Quintile
% CAR
Lower Quintile
% CAR
Higher Quintile
HIS
Comprehensive Assessment Measure
93.4%

2.4%

4.2%

93.5%

2.1%

4.4%

93.3%

2.5%

4.2%

VerDate Sep<11>2014

20:53 Aug 03, 2021

Jkt 253001

PO 00000

Frm 00054

Fmt 4701

Sfmt 4725

E:FRFM04AUR4.SGM

04AUR4

ER04AU21.153

Rural Providers
ER04AU21.152

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES4

Overall
ER04AU21.154

TABLE 16: Performance: Comparison of Quintile Rankings between COVID-19 PHE Affected CAR and Standard Public Reporting SPR Scenarios

Acerca de esta edición

Federal Register - August 4, 2021

TítuloFederal Register

PaísEstados Unidos de América

Fecha04/08/2021

Nro. de páginas799

Nro. de ediciones7802

Primera edición14/03/1936

Ultima edición25/06/2026

Descargar esta edición

Otras ediciones

<<<Agosto 2021>>>
DLMMJVS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031