Quiero saber acerca de...

41818

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 3, 2021 / Notices domestic interested party, filed rebuttal comments concerning Maquilaceros allegations.3 On July 12, 2021, Maquilacero filed ministerial error surrebuttal comments.4 Commerce is amending its Final Results to correct certain ministerial errors alleged by Maquilacero.

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration A201836

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From Mexico: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 20182019
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Commerce is amending the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty AD order on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from Mexico to correct certain ministerial errors. The period of review is August 1, 2018, through July 31, 2019.
DATES: Applicable August 3, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Clahane or John Conniff, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
202 4825449 or 202 4821009, respectively.
AGENCY:

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background On June 25, 2021, the Department of Commerce Commerce published its Final Results of the 20182019
administrative review of the AD order on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from Mexico.1 On July 6, 2021, Maquilacero S.A. de C.V Maquilacero, one of the respondents in this administrative review, timely submitted ministerial error comments regarding Commerces Final Results.2 On July 8, 2021, Nucor Tubular Products, Inc., a
Legal Framework A ministerial error, as defined in section 751h of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended the Act, includes errors in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other type of unintentional error which the Commerce considers ministerial. 5
With respect to final results of administrative reviews, 19 CFR
351.224e provides that Commerce will analyze any comments received and, if appropriate, correct any ministerial error by amending . . . the final results of review. . . .
Ministerial Errors Commerce committed inadvertent, unintentional errors within the meaning of section 751h of the Act and 19 CFR
351.224f with respect to an adjustment to the currency conversion of the gross unit price for certain of Maquilaceros home market sales, an adjustment to Maquilaceros scrap offset, the duplication of certain computer programming steps concerning Maquilaceros costs of production, and an adjustment to the further processing costs of Maquilaceros affiliate Tecnicas de Fluidos S.A. de C.V. Accordingly, Commerce determines that, in accordance with section 751h of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224f, it made certain ministerial errors in the Final Results.

For a complete description and analysis of Maquilaceros ministerial error allegations, please see the accompanying Ministerial Error Allegations Memorandum.6 The Ministerial Error Allegations Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliances Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System ACCESS.
ACCESS is available to registered users at https access.trade.gov.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224e, Commerce is amending the Final Results to reflect the correction of certain ministerial errors in the calculation of the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Maquilacero in the Final Results, which changes from 4.23 percent to 3.13
percent.7 Furthermore, we are revising the review-specific, weighted-average dumping margin applicable to the companies not selected for individual examination in this administrative review, which is based, in part, on Maquilaceros weighted-average dumping margin.8 For the companies which were not selected for individual examination, we have calculated their weighted-average dumping margin as the weighted average of the weightedaverage dumping margins determined for the two mandatory respondents where the weights are the publicly ranged quantities sold by each of the mandatory respondents.
Amended Final Results of the Review As a result of correcting these ministerial errors, Commerce determines that, for the period of August 1, 2018, through July 31, 2019, the following weighted-average dumping margins exist:
Weighted-average dumping margin percent
Exporter or producer
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES

Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. and Tecnicas de Fluidos S.A. de C.V.
Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S. de R.L. de C.V. formerly Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S.A. de C.V. 9 10
Aceros Cuatro Caminos S.A. de C.V.
Fabricaciones y Servicios de Mexico
Grupo Estructuras y Perfiles
1 See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 20182019, 86 FR 33646
June 25, 2021 Final Results, and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.
2 See Maquilaceros Letter, Maquilacero S.A. de C.V.s Ministerial Error Comments for the Final Results, dated July 6, 2021.
3 See Nucors Letter, Comments on Maquilaceros Ministerial Errors, dated July 8, 2021.
4 See Maquilaceros Letter, Maquilacero S.A. de C.V.s Rebuttal Ministerial Error Comments for the Final Results, dated July 12, 2021.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:21 Aug 02, 2021

Jkt 253001

5 See
also 19 CFR 351.224f.
Memorandum, Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico; 20182019: Ministerial Error Allegations, dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice Ministerial Error Allegations Memorandum.
7 Id.
8 In the case of two mandatory respondents, our practice is to calculate: A A weighted average of the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory respondents; B a simple average of the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory respondents:
and C a weighted average of the dumping margins 6 See
PO 00000

Frm 00008

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

3.13
5.44
4.44
4.44
4.44

calculated for the mandatory respondents using each companys publicly ranged values for the merchandise under consideration. We compare B
and C to A and select the rate closest to A as the most appropriate rate for all other companies.
See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014
2016, 82 FR 31555, 31556 July 7, 2017. We have applied that practice here. See Memorandum, Calculation of Margin for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination, dated concurrently with this notice.

E:FRFM03AUN1.SGM

03AUN1