Federal Register - August 2, 2021

Versión en texto ¿Qué es?Dateas es un sitio independiente no afiliado a entidades gubernamentales. La fuente de los documentos PDF aquí publicados es la entidad gubernamental indicada en cada uno de ellos. Las versiones en texto son transcripciones no oficiales que realizamos para facilitar el acceso y la búsqueda de información, pero pueden contener errores o no estar completas.

Fuente: Federal Register

41419

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2CURRENT AND HISTORICAL CO DESIGN VALUES DV FOR THE LAS VEGAS VALLEY AREAContinued Highest second maximum 8-hour CO value ppm Year J.D. Smith 320032002

Rancho &
Teddy 320031501

2.4
2.2
2 2
b 1.9



c 1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4

Jerome Mack 320030540
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020 a

2.7
2.7
2.3
2.35
2.5
2.3
2.1

Sunrise Acres 320030540
2.9
2.8
2.6
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.4

DV
ppm
2.9
2.8
2.6
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.4

Is DV less than 7.65
ppm?

Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.

Source: EPA, Air Quality System, Design Value Report, March 16, 2021.
a CO design values have no annual completeness requirement.
b The J.D. Smith station was permanently shut down with the EPAs approval on December 31, 2017, due to measurement challenges posed by siting obstructions.
c The Rancho & Teddy station opened in 2015 and began monitoring CO in January 2017.

3. Monitoring Network and Verification of Continued Attainment The EPA periodically reviews the CO
monitoring network operated and maintained by CCDES in accordance with 40 CFR part 58. This network is consistent with the Clark County ambient air monitoring network plan AMNP submitted annually to the EPA
after a public notification and comment process. The EPA has reviewed and approved the AMNP every year for the past three years from 20182020. The EPA is also required to conduct technical systems audits TSA every three years to ensure quality assurance of monitoring organizations.20 The most recent TSA for CCDES was in 2018, and the EPA found that CCDESs air monitoring program meets EPAs requirements.21
To verify the attainment status of the area over the maintenance period, the maintenance plan should contain provisions for continued operations of an EPA-approved monitoring network in accordance with 40 CFR part 58. The CCDESs network in the Las Vegas Valley area has been approved by the EPA in accordance with 40 CFR part 58.22 Furthermore, the CCDES has committed to continue to operate an air quality monitoring network in the Las Vegas Valley area in accordance with the EPA requirements to verify continued attainment of the CO
20 40

CFR 58 Appendix A, section 2.5.
dated August 23, 2018 from Elizabeth J.
Adams, Acting Director, Air Division Region IX, to Marci Henson, Director, Clark County Department of Air Quality with attached Technical Systems Audit of the Ambient Air Monitoring Program:
Clark County Department of Air Quality October 2325, 2017 and January 1618, 2018.
22 For further details, see CCDESs 2020 Annual Monitoring Network Plan AMNP, the EPAs approval letter for the 2020, 2019 and 2018 AMNP, as well as the EPAs Clark County 2018 TSA report, in the docket for this action.

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS

21 Letter
VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:46 Jul 30, 2021

Jkt 253001

NAAQS.23 For the reasons stated in this section of the notice, we find Clark Countys monitoring network adequate to verify continued attainment of the CO
NAAQS in the Las Vegas Valley area.
4. Contingency Plan Section 175Ad of the CAA requires that a maintenance plan include contingency provisions. The purpose of these provisions is to prevent future violations of the NAAQS or promptly remediate any NAAQS violations that might occur during the maintenance period. These contingency provisions need not be fully adopted regulations at the time of the redesignation. However, the contingency plan is an enforceable part of the SIP and should ensure that contingency measures are adopted quickly once the contingency plan is triggered. The contingency plan should also identify the measures to be expeditiously adopted and provide a schedule and procedure for adoption and implementation. The state is also required to identify triggers that will be used to determine when contingency measures will need to be implemented.
In the 2019 LMP, the CCDES retains the reduced Reid vapor pressure RVP
gasoline program contingency measure from its first CO maintenance plan as a contingency measure. The RVP gasoline program relaxed the RVP from wintertime fuels sold in Clark County from 9.0 pounds per square inch psi to 13.5 psi, thereby increasing fuel volatility and therefore fuel-related emissions. The EPA approved this measure, finding that relaxation of RVP
would not interfere with maintenance of the CO standard in the area.24 The RVP
gasoline program contingency measure 23 See 2019 LMP, Section 3.3, Monitoring Network/Verification of Continued Attainment, 21.
24 75 FR 59090.

PO 00000

Frm 00010

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

would reinstate the prior, lower RVP
level. That is, if future CO levels trigger contingency measures, the CCDES will seek reinstatement and tightening of the RVP standard back to 9.0 psi. This contingency measure would be triggered by a verified second exceedance over 9
ppm during the winter season October 1 through March 31 within a consecutive two-year period.
The EPA proposes to find that the contingency provisions in the 2019 LMP
satisfy the contingency measure requirements of CAA section 175A for the second 10-year maintenance plan period.
IV. Transportation Conformity Transportation conformity is required by section 176c of the CAA.
Conformity to a SIP means that transportation activities will not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the NAAQS. The EPAs conformity rule at 40 CFR part 93
requires that transportation plans, programs, and projects conform to SIPs and establishes the criteria and procedures for determining conformity.
The conformity rule generally requires a demonstration that emissions from the regional transportation plan RTP and the transportation improvement plan TIP are consistent with the motor vehicle emissions budget MVEB or budget contained in the control strategy SIP revision or maintenance plan.25 A budget is defined as the level of mobile source emissions of a pollutant relied upon in the attainment or maintenance demonstration to attain or maintain compliance with the 25 See
E:FRFM02AUP1.SGM

40 CFR 93.101, 93.118, and 93.124.

02AUP1

Acerca de esta edición

Federal Register - August 2, 2021

TítuloFederal Register

PaísEstados Unidos de América

Fecha02/08/2021

Nro. de páginas328

Nro. de ediciones7797

Primera edición14/03/1936

Ultima edición17/06/2026

Descargar esta edición

Otras ediciones

<<<Agosto 2021>>>
DLMMJVS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031