Quiero saber acerca de...

41416

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Quality DEQ transitioned from the North Dakota Department of Public Health, their Conflict of Interest requirements changed. This revision updates section 2.15 of the SIP to match the current DEQ requirements.
III. Proposed Action For the reasons described in section II
of this proposed rulemaking, the EPA is proposing to approve North Dakotas August 3, 2020, submittal revisions to NDAC, Article 33.115 Air Pollution Control except for revisions to 33.115
25 Regional Haze Requirements which were addressed in a separate rulemaking. The EPA is also proposing to approve North Dakotas revisions to section 2.15 Respecting Boards located in North Dakotas EPA Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and QuasiRegulatory Measures. Our action is based on an evaluation of North Dakotas revisions against the requirements of CAA section 110a2c and regulatory requirements under 40 CFR 51.160164 and 40 CFR
51.166.
IV. Incorporation by Reference In this document, the EPA is proposing to include regulatory text in an EPA final rule that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the revisions described in section II. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 8 Office please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information.

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410k; 40 CFR 52.02a.
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPAs role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993 and 13563 76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011;

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:46 Jul 30, 2021

Jkt 253001

Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.;
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.;
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Pub. L. 1044;
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999;
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997;
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001;
Is not subject to requirements of section 12d of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 15 U.S.C. 272 note because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898
59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Greenhouse gases, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: July 22, 2021.
Debra H. Thomas, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
FR Doc. 202116093 Filed 73021; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 656050P

PO 00000

Frm 00007

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
EPAR09OAR20210242; FRL872501
R9

Air Plan Approval; Nevada, Las Vegas Valley; Second 10-Year Carbon Monoxide Limited Maintenance Plan Environmental Protection Agency EPA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:

The Environmental Protection Agency EPA is proposing to approve a Nevada State Implementation Plan SIP
revision submitted by the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection NDEP. On September 27, 2010, the EPA redesignated the Las Vegas Valley area from nonattainment to attainment for the carbon monoxide CO national ambient air quality standard NAAQS or standard and approved the States CO maintenance plan ensuring the area would maintain the NAAQS for ten years through 2020. On June 18, 2019, NDEP submitted to the EPA a second 10-year limited maintenance plan LMP
for the Las Vegas Valley area for the CO
NAAQS. The LMP addresses maintenance of the CO NAAQS for a second 10-year period ending in 2030.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by September 1, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPAR09
OAR20210166 at https
www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information CBI
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions audio, video, etc. must be accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system. For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit SUMMARY:

E:FRFM02AUP1.SGM

02AUP1