Quiero saber acerca de...

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 139 / Friday, July 23, 2021 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES

interested parties, on February 4, 2021, Commerce published the notice of initiation of an administrative review with respect to 83 companies, in accordance with section 751a of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended the Act.2 Subsequent to the initiation of the administrative review, the petitioner 3
timely withdrew its request for an administrative review of 19 companies on May 5, 2021.4 Eight 5 of the 19
companies requested their own review of their entries and did not withdraw their requests for review.6 Thus, Commerce will only be rescinding this review with respect to the 11 companies for which a review request was received and subsequently withdrawn by the partyies requesting review.
BYD Shangluo Industrial Co., Ltd.
BYD also withdrew its self-requested review on May 5, 2021.7 However, the petitioner also requested a review of BYD and has not withdrawn the request;
therefore, Commerce will not rescind the review with respect to BYD. There to Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 77431
December 2, 2020.
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR
8166 February 4, 2021 Initiation Notice.
3 The petitioner is the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing.
4 See Petitioners Letter, Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the Peoples Republic of China:
Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review, dated May 5, 2021.
5 These eight companies are Canadian Solar International Limited Canadian Solar, Jinko Solar Co., Ltd., Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd.
collectively Jinko Solar, Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd., JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd. JA Solar Co., Ltd. a.k.a. JingAo Solar Co., Ltd. collectively JA Solar, Risen Energy Co., Ltd. Risen, and Yingli Energy China Co., Ltd.Yingli.
6 See Canadian Solars Letter, Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules from the Peoples Republic of China: Request for Review, dated December 29, 2020; see also Jinko Solars Letter, GDLSK Respondents Request for Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules C570980POR: 01/
01/1912/31/19, dated December 31, 2020; JA
Solars Letter, Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules from the Peoples Republic of China:
Request for Review, dated December 29, 2020;
Risens Letter, Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells from the Peoples Republic of ChinaRequest for Administrative Review, dated December 31, 2020; and Yinglis Letter, Countervailing Duty Order on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules: Yinglis Request for Administrative Review, dated December 22, 2020.
7 See BYDs Letter, Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the Peoples Republic of China:
Withdrawal of Request for Review2019 Review Period, dated May 5, 2021.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:49 Jul 22, 2021

Jkt 253001

are active review requests on the record for the remaining 72 companies.
Partial Rescission of Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213d1, Commerce will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested a review withdraws its request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation. All requests for an administrative review were withdrawn by the established deadline of May 5, 2021, for the companies listed in the appendix. As a result, Commerce is rescinding this review with respect to these companies, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.213d1. The administrative review will continue with respect to the remaining 72 companies listed in our Initiation Notice.8

38979

Dated: July 19, 2021.
James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.

Appendix Companies Rescinded From Review 1. Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science &
Technology Co., Ltd.
2. Jiawei Solarchina Shenzhen Co., Ltd.
3. Jiawei Solarchina Co., Ltd.
4. Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd.
5. Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd.
6. Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd.
7. Shenzhen Topray Solar Co., Ltd.
8. Taizhou BD Trade Co., Ltd.
9. Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd.
10. Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd.
11. Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd.
FR Doc. 202115742 Filed 72221; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 3510DSP

Assessment
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection CBP to assess countervailing duties on all appropriate entries. For the companies for which this review is rescinded, countervailing duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212cli.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
days after the date of publication of this rescission notice in the Federal Register.

International Trade Administration
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751a1 and 777il of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213d4.

PO 00000

8 See
Initiation Notice, 86 FR at 817273.

Frm 00010

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

A570909

Certain Steel Nails From the Peoples Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Scope Ruling and Notice of Amended Final Scope Ruling Pursuant to Court Decision Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 12, 2021, the U.S.
Court of International Trade CIT
issued its final judgment in Midwest Fastener Corp. v. United States, Court No. 1700231, sustaining the Department of Commerces Commerces remand redetermination pertaining to a scope ruling in which Commerce found Midwest Fastener Corp. Midwests strike pin anchors to be outside the scope of the antidumping duty AD order on certain steel nails from the Peoples Republic of China.
Commerce is notifying the public that the CITs final judgment is not in harmony with Commerces scope ruling, and that Commerce is amending the scope ruling to find that Midwests strike pin anchors are not covered by the order.
DATES: Applicable July 22, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kelsie Hohenberger, AD/CVD
Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
202 4822517.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:

E:FRFM23JYN1.SGM

23JYN1