Quiero saber acerca de...

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 112 / Monday, June 14, 2021 / Proposed Rules Bay Swim, 1.4 Waves of Hope Swim, 1.5
Stonewall Swim and 1.6 Swim Across America Greenwich.

NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Section U.S.C. United States Code
Dated: April 29, 2021.
E.J. Van Camp, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Long Island Sound.

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
AGENCY:

On May 26, 2010 the Coast Guard published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking NPRM prosposing to, among other things, establish a security zone for the Sabine Pass LNG mooring basin located in Cameron Parish, LA
while LNG carriers are moored at the facility. On October 22, 2010 the Coast Guard issued an interim rule for the proposed security zone and on January 11, 2011 the Coast Guard published a final rule for the security zone.
Sabine Pass LNG is constructing a second mooring basin adjacent to the first and the COTP has determined that enhanced security measures are necessary and requires extending the existing security zone to include the new mooring basin.

ACTION:

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
FR Doc. 202112401 Filed 61121; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 911004P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165
Docket Number USCG20210120
RIN 1625AA87

Security Zones; Sabine Pass Channel, Cameron, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Proposed rule.

The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a permanent security zone within a new mooring basin at the Sabine Pass LNG facility in Cameron, LA. This proposed rule would prohibit persons and vessels from entering the security zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Port Arthur or a designated representative. Additionally, the Coast Guard proposes to improve the language describing the area and to correct a geographical error. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY:

Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before July 14, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG
20210120 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https
www.regulations.gov. See the Public Participation and Request for Comments portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments.
DATES:

If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Scott Whalen, Marine Safety Unit Port Arthur, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 409719
5080, email scott.k.whalen@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations COTP Captain of the Port, Port Arthur DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register LNG Liquified Natural Gas
VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:49 Jun 11, 2021

Jkt 253001

The COTP is proposing to establish a permanent security zone in a new mooring basin at Sabine Pass LNG
located in Cameron, LA. The security zone regulations would be the same as those in effect for the existing mooring basin, that is, it would exclude certain vessels from entering the basin whenever an LNG carrier is moored at the facility. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative.
Additionally, the Coast Guard proposes to improve the language describing the area and to correct a geographical error in the CFR. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits.
This NPRM has not been designated a significant regulatory action, under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget OMB.

PO 00000

Frm 00009

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

31459

This regulatory action determination is based on the limited size and that the affected area does not hinder or delay regular vessel traffic. Certain vessels with business in the mooring basin will be authorized to enter.
B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term small entities comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605b that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the secutiy zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment see ADDRESSES explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213a of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 Pub. L. 104121, we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
44 U.S.C. 35013520.
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
E:FRFM14JNP1.SGM

14JNP1