Quiero saber acerca de...

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES

15602

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 24, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
280.43 Methods of release detection for tanks.
280.44 Methods of release detection for piping.
280.45 Release detection recordkeeping.
280.50 Reporting of suspected releases.
280.51 Investigation due to off-site impacts.
280.52 Release investigation and confirmation steps.
280.53 Reporting and cleanup of spills and overfills.
280.60 General.
280.61 Initial response.
280.62 Initial abatement measures and site check.
280.63 Initial site characterization.
280.64 Free product removal.
280.65 Investigations for soil and groundwater cleanup.
280.66 Corrective action plan.
280.70 Temporary closure.
280.71 Permanent closure and changesin-service.
280.72 Assessing the site at closure or change-in-service.
280.73 Applicability to previously closed UST systems.
280.74 Closure records.
280.90 Applicability.
280.91 Compliance dates.
280.92 Definition of terms.
280.93 Amount and scope of required financial responsibility.
280.94 Allowable mechanisms and combinations of mechanisms.
280.95 Financial test of self-assurance.
280.96 Guarantee.
280.97 Insurance and risk retention group coverage.
280.98 Surety Bond.
280.99 Letter of credit.
280.100 Use of state-required mechanism Reserved.
280.101 State fund or other state assurance, except b through e.
280.102 Trust Fund.
280.103 Standby trust fund.
280.104 Local government bond rating test.
280.105 Local government financial test.
280.106 Local government guarantee.
280.107 Local government fund.
280.108 Substitution of financial assurance mechanisms by owner or operator.
280.109 Cancellation or non-renewal by a provider of financial assurance.
280.110 Reporting by owner or operator.
280.111 Recordkeeping.
280.112 Drawing on financial assurance mechanisms.
280.113 Release from the requirements.
280.114 Bankruptcy or other incapacity of owner or operator or provider of financial assurance.
280.115 Replenishment of guarantees, letters of credit, or surety bonds.
280.116 Suspension of enforcement Reserved.
280.200 Definitions.
280.210 Participation in management.
280.220 Ownership of an underground storage tank or underground storage tank system or facility or property on which an underground storage tank or underground storage tank system is located.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

15:49 Mar 23, 2021

Jkt 253001

280.230 Operating an underground storage tank or underground storage tank system.
280.240 General requirement for all UST
systems, except b.
280.241 Designation of Class A, B, and C
operators.
280.242 Requirements for operator training.
280.243 Timing of operator training.
280.244 Retraining.
280.245 Documentation.
280.250 Definitions.
280.251 General Requirements.
280.252 Additions, exceptions, and alternatives for UST systems with fieldconstructed tanks and airport hydrant systems.
C Copies of the South Carolina statutes and regulations that are incorporated by reference are available from the South Carolina State Register, 223 Blatt Building, 1105 Pendleton Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201; Phone number: 803 212
4500; website: https www.scstatehouse.gov/.
FR Doc. 202105422 Filed 32321; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 656050P

Executive Summary
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17
Docket No. FWSR1ES20180033;
FXES111300000900000 178 FF09E42000
RIN 1018BC65

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Establishment of a Nonessential Experimental Population of the California Condor in the Pacific Northwest Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:

We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Service or USFWS, are establishing a nonessential experimental population NEP of the California condor Gymnogyps californianus in the Pacific Northwest, under section 10j of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended Act.
Establishment of this NEP will facilitate reintroduction of California condors to the region and provide for allowable legal incidental taking of the California condor within a defined NEP area. The geographic boundaries of the NEP
include northern California, northwest Nevada, and Oregon. The best available data indicate that reintroduction of the California condor into the Pacific Northwest is biologically feasible and will promote the conservation of the species.
DATES: This final rule is effective April 23, 2021.
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00042

Fmt 4700

This final rule is available on http www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FWSR1ES20180033 and on our website at https ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/
profile/speciesProfile?spcode=B002.
Comments and materials we received, as well as supporting documentation we used in preparing this rule, are also available for public inspection at http
www.regulations.gov. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf TDD may call the Federal Relay Service at 18008778339.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jesse DElia, Pacific Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services, 911 NE 11th Ave., Portland, OR 97232; telephone 503
2316131. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf TDD may call the Federal Relay Service at 18008778339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:

Sfmt 4700

Why we need to publish a rule. Under the Endangered Species Act, a population of a threatened or endangered species may be designated as an experimental population prior to its reintroduction. Experimental populations can only be designated by issuing a rule.
What this document does. This rule will designate California condors Gymnogyps californianus reintroduced to the Pacific Northwest as a nonessential experimental population on the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife in title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations at 50 CFR
17.11h with a rule issued under section 10j of the Act hereafter referred to as a 10j rule at 50 CFR
17.84.
The basis for our action. Based on the best scientific and commercial data available in accordance with 50 CFR
17.81, we find that releasing the California condors into the Pacific Northwest, with the regulatory provisions in this final rulemaking, will further the conservation of the species.
The nonessential experimental population status is appropriate for the reintroduced population because we have determined that it is not essential to the continued existence of the species in the wild.
In making our finding that this action will further the conservation of the species, we evaluate any possible adverse effects on extant California condor populations, the likelihood that any such experimental population will become established and survive in the foreseeable future, the relative effects that establishment of an experimental
E:FRFM24MRR1.SGM

24MRR1