Quiero saber acerca de...

11480

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 36 / Thursday, February 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review, under paragraph L49, of Chapter 3, Table 31 of the U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum for the Record are required for this rule. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, and will consider all comments and material received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https
www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted using https
www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted without change to https
www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions in response to this document, see DHSs eRulemaking System of Records notice 85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in this docket and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that
VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:43 Feb 24, 2021

Jkt 253001

websites instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.051;
and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

2. Amend 117.371 by revising paragraphs a and b to read as follows:

117.371

Savannah River.

a The draw of the James P. Houlihan SR 25 Bridge, mile 21.6 at Port Wentworth, Georgia, shall open if at least a 24 hour advance notice is given.
Openings can be arranged by contacting Georgia Department of Transportation Savannah Area Office at 1912651
2144.
b The draw of the CSX
Transportation Railroad Bridge, mile 27.4 near Hardeeville, South Carolina, shall open if at least a 24 hour advance notice is given. Openings can be arranged by contacting CSX
Transportation at 18002320144.

Dated: February 1, 2021.
Eric C. Jones, Rear Admiral, U. S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District.
FR Doc. 202103683 Filed 22421; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 911004P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
EPAR09OAR20180601; FRL10019
96Region 9

Limited Approval, Limited Disapproval of California Air Plan Revision; YoloSolano Air Quality Management District Environmental Protection Agency EPA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.

Management District YSAQMD
portion of the California State Implementation Plan SIP. This revision concerns emissions of volatile organic compounds VOCs from solvent cleaning and degreasing operations. We are proposing action on a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act CAA or the Act. We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 29, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPAR09
OAR20180601 at http
www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information CBI
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions audio, video, etc. must be accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system. For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX 415
9723024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, we, us and our refer to the EPA.

AGENCY:

Table of Contents
The Environmental Protection Agency EPA is proposing a limited approval and limited disapproval of a revision to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality
I. The States Submittal A. What rule did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of this rule?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule?
II. The EPAs Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?

SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00008

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

E:FRFM25FEP1.SGM

25FEP1