Quiero saber acerca de...

7878

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 20 / Tuesday, February 2, 2021 / Notices
upon the Commissions procedures with respect to filings.
In accordance with sections 201.16c and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the reviews must be served on all other parties to the review as identified by either the public or BPI
service list, and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service.
Determination.The Commission has determined these reviews are extraordinarily complicated and therefore has determined to exercise its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1675c5B.
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commissions rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 28, 2021.
Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission.
FR Doc. 202102156 Filed 2121; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 702002P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Investigation No. 337TA1243

Certain Active Matrix OLED Display Devices and Components Thereof;
Institution of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES

AGENCY:

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on December 28, 2020, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Solas OLED Ltd. of Ireland. An amended complaint was filed on January 5, 2021, and a supplement to the amended complaint was filed on January 13, 2021. The complaint, as amended and supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain active matrix OLED display devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,573,068 the 068
patent and U.S. Patent No. 7,868,880
the 880 patent. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the
VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:08 Feb 01, 2021

Jkt 253001

Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, may be viewed on the Commissions electronic docket EDIS
at https edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commissions TDD
terminal on 202 2051810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202 205
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https www.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pathenia M. Proctor, Office of Unfair Import Investigations, telephone 202
2052560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority:
The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commissions Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 2020.
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on January 27, 2021, ordered that 1 Pursuant to subsection b of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection a1B of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph 2 by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1317 of the 068 patent; and claims 2
40 of the 880 patent; and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection a2 of section 337;
2 Pursuant to section 210.10b1 of the Commissions Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10b1, the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is electronic devices containing active matrix OLED displays and components thereof, i.e., mobile phones and tablets with active matrix OLED displays;
3 For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following
PO 00000

Frm 00039

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:
a The complainant is:
Solas OLED Ltd., Suite 23, The Hyde Building, Carrickmines, Dublin 18, Ireland b The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served:
BOE Technology Group Co. Ltd., No.12
Xihuanzhong Rd., BDA, Beijing, 100176, Peoples Republic of China Beijing BOE Display Technology Co., Ltd., No.118 Jinghaiyi Rd BDA, Beijing, 100176, Peoples Republic of China BOE Technology America Inc., 2350
Mission College Blvd., Suite 600, Santa Clara, CA 95054
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 129
Samsung-Ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwonsi,, Gyeonggi-do, 443742, South Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 85
Challenger Rd., Ridgefield Park, NJ
07660
Samsung Display Co., Ltd., 1 SamsungRo Giheung-gu, Yongin-si,, GyeonggiDo, 17113, South Korea c The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and 4 For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commissions Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16e and 210.13a, as amended in 85 FR 15798 March 19, 2020, such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the complainant of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as
E:FRFM02FEN1.SGM

02FEN1