Quiero saber acerca de...

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES

7554

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 18 / Friday, January 29, 2021 / Notices
electronic manifests originated in the eManifest system as the legal equivalent to paper manifests; 2 require manifest users to submit paper copies of the manifest to the system for data processing; 3 collect manifests in the e-Manifest system for hazardous waste subject to federal or state law; and 4
set up user fees to offset the costs of developing and operating the e-Manifest system.
Pursuant to the Act, EPA modified the manifest regulations on February 7, 2014 the e-Manifest One Year Rule, to authorize use of electronic manifests or e-Manifests for tracking offsite shipments of hazardous waste from a generators site to the site of the receipt and disposition of the hazardous waste.
On January 3, 2018, EPA finalized the e-Manifest User Fee Final Rule which established the fee methodology that EPA uses to determine the user fees applicable to the electronic and paper manifests submitted to the national system. EPA launched the e-Manifest system on June 30, 2018. TSDFs and other receiving facilities must submit manifests, both paper and electronic, to EPA. In addition to fees for RCRA
wastes, EPA is charging TSDFs and other facilities receiving state-only regulated wastes a fee for each manifest submitted to the system. Regulations regarding copy submission requirements for interstate shipments and the applicability of e-Manifest system and fees to facilities receiving state-only regulated wastes are found in 40 CFR
part 260 Hazardous Waste Management System. Regulations regarding imposition of user fees on receiving facilities for their manifest submissions, with references to key fee methodology, fee dispute, and fee sanction requirements are found in parts 264 and 265.
Form Numbers: Form 870022 and 870022A.
Respondents/affected entities:
Business or other for-profit.
Respondents obligation to respond:
Mandatory RCRA 3002a5.
Estimated number of respondents:
106,136 total.
Frequency of response: Each shipment.
Total estimated burden: 2,362,089
hours per year. Burden is defined at 5
CFR 1320.03b.
Total estimated cost: $118,940,729
per year, includes $29,043,234
annualized capital costs and operation &
maintenance costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 140,411 hours in the total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently approved by OMB, resulting from EPAs updates to
VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:43 Jan 28, 2021

Jkt 253001

the annual number of manifests offered into transportation. Based on its recent analysis of e-Manifest data, EPA
estimates a decrease in the annual number of paper and electronic manifests from the currently approved ICR. In addition, there is an increase of $3,273,919 in the total respondent costs compared with the currently approved ICR. This increase resulted primarily from an improved methodology and updated data for estimating the user fees paid by destination facilities.
Courtney Kerwin, Director, Regulatory Support Division.
FR Doc. 202101974 Filed 12821; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 656050P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs 212A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900

Indian Entities Recognized by and Eligible To Receive Services From the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

This notice publishes the current list of 574 Tribal entities recognized by and eligible for funding and services from the Bureau of Indian Affairs BIA by virtue of their status as Indian Tribes.
DATES: The list is updated from the notice published on January 30, 2020
85 FR 5462.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Laurel Iron Cloud, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Tribal Government Services, Mail Stop 3645MIB, 1849 C
Street NW, Washington, DC 20240.
Telephone number: 202 5137641.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to Section 104 of the Act of November 2, 1994
Pub. L. 103454; 108 Stat. 4791, 4792, and in exercise of authority delegated to the Assistant SecretaryIndian Affairs under 25 U.S.C. 2 and 9 and 209 DM 8.
Published below is an updated list of federally acknowledged Indian Tribes in the contiguous 48 states and Alaska.
Amendments to the list include formatting edits, name changes, and name corrections.
To aid in identifying Tribal name changes and corrections, the Tribes previously listed or former name is included in parentheses after the correct current Tribal name. We will continue to list the Tribes former or previously SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00029

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

listed name for several years before dropping the former or previously listed name from the list.
The listed Indian entities are acknowledged to have the immunities and privileges available to federally recognized Indian Tribes by virtue of their government-to-government relationship with the United States as well as the responsibilities, powers, limitations, and obligations of such Tribes. We have continued the practice of listing the Alaska Native entities separately for the purpose of facilitating identification of them.
Tara Sweeney, Assistant SecretaryIndian Affairs.

Indian Tribal Entities Within the Contiguous 48 States Recognized by and Eligible To Receive Services From the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California Ak-Chin Indian Community previously listed as Ak Chin Indian Community of the Maricopa Ak Chin Indian Reservation, Arizona Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas previously listed as Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town Alturas Indian Rancheria, California Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Arapaho Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming Aroostook Band of Micmacs previously listed as Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians, California previously listed as Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin Bay Mills Indian Community, Michigan Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria, California Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California Big Lagoon Rancheria, California Big Pine Paiute Tribe of the Owens Valley previously listed as Big Pine Band of Owens Valley Paiute Shoshone Indians of the Big Pine Reservation, California Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians of California previously listed as Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians of the Big Valley Rancheria, California Bishop Paiute Tribe previously listed as Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community of the Bishop Colony, California Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation of Montana
E:FRFM29JAN1.SGM

29JAN1