Federal Register - January 25, 2021
Versión en texto ¿Qué es?Dateas es un sitio independiente no afiliado a entidades gubernamentales. La fuente de los documentos PDF aquí publicados es la entidad gubernamental indicada en cada uno de ellos. Las versiones en texto son transcripciones no oficiales que realizamos para facilitar el acceso y la búsqueda de información, pero pueden contener errores o no estar completas.
Fuente: Federal Register
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 14 / Monday, January 25, 2021 / Notices 2018 through August 31, 2019.
Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable January 25, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Davina Friedmann, Mark Flessner, or Frank Schmitt, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202 4820698, 202 4826312, or 202 4824880, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
These preliminary results are made in accordance with section 733b of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended the Act.
Commerce published the notice of initiation of this administrative review on November 12, 2019.1 Commerce selected Hyundai Steel Company Hyundai Steel and SeAH Steel Corporation SeAH as the two mandatory respondents in this review.2
On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative reviews by 50 days.3 On June 30, 2020, Commerce extended the deadline of the preliminary results of review by 100
days, until October 29, 2020, in accordance with 751a3A of the Act.4 On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative reviews by an additional 60 days,5 thereby extending the deadline for these preliminary results until December 28, 2020. On November 25, 2020, in accordance with section 751a3A of the Act, Commerce extended the preliminary results of review by an additional 18 days, until January 15, 2021.6
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR
61011 November 12, 2019 Initiation Notice.
2 See Memorandum, 20182019 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea:
Respondent Selection, dated December 23, 2019.
3 See Memorandum, Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, dated April 24, 2020
First Tolling Memorandum.
4 See Memorandum, Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea, 2018
2019: Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, dated June 30, 2020 First Extension of Preliminary Review Results Memorandum.
5 See Memorandum, Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, dated July 21, 2020
Second Tolling Memorandum.
6 See Memorandum, Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea, 2018
2019: Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, dated November 25, 2020 Second
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:31 Jan 22, 2021
Jkt 253001
For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this administrative review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, dated concurrently with these preliminary results and hereby adopted by this notice.7 A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix I to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliances Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System ACCESS. ACCESS is available to registered users at https
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Scope of the Order The product covered by the Order 8 is OCTG from Korea. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Methodology Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance with section 751a2 of the Act.
Commerce has calculated export prices in accordance with section 772a of the Act. Constructed export prices have been calculated in accordance with section 772b of the Act. Normal value NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. Commerce preliminarily finds that a cost-based particular market situation PMS
existed in Korea during the POR
concerning the cost of hot-rolled coil HRC as a component of the cost of production for the OCTG that Hyundai Steel and SeAH produced.9 We Extension of Preliminary Review Results Memorandum.
7 See Memorandum, Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results in the 20182019
Administrative Review of Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
8 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, the Republic of Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Antidumping Duty Orders; and Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 53691 September 10, 2014 Order.
9 For a complete discussion, see Memorandum, 20182019 Administrative Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea:
Decisions on Particular Market Situation
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6869
quantified the impact of the particular market situation on the material cost of HRC, and derived a corresponding adjustment factor that, when applied to the cost of HRC, accounts for the distortions induced by the observed particular market situation.10 For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Rates for Non-Examined Companies The statute and Commerces regulations do not address the rate to be applied to companies not selected for examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777Ac2 of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735c5 of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 735c5A of the Act, the all-others rate is normally an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely on the basis of facts available.
In this review, we have preliminarily calculated weighted-average dumping margins for SeAH that is not zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on the basis of facts available. Accordingly, Commerce preliminarily has assigned to the companies not individually examined see Appendix II for a full list of these companies a margin of 1.07
percent, which is the weighted average dumping margin of SeAH for these preliminary results of review.11
Preliminary Results of Review Commerce preliminarily determines that, for the period September 1, 2018
through August 31, 2019, the following weighted-average dumping margins exist:
Allegations, dated concurrently with this Federal Register Notice PMS Memorandum.
10 See PMS Memorandum.
11 For more information regarding the calculation of this margin, see Memorandum, Preliminary Results of the 20182019 Administrative Review of Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea; Calculation of the Margin for Non-Examined Companies, dated concurrently with this memorandum.
E:FRFM25JAN1.SGM
25JAN1