Quiero saber acerca de...

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 13 / Friday, January 22, 2021 / Proposed Rules approve these portions of the SIP
revisions.
III. Incorporation by Reference In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District Regulation 6.21, Standard of Performance for Existing Gasoline Loading Facilities at Bulk Terminals, Version 3, and Regulation 7.20, Standard of Performance for New Gasoline Loading Facilities at Bulk Plants, Version 3, state-effective June 19, 2019, with the exception of the phrase or an alternate procedure approved by the District in Regulation 6.21, subsection 3.6.4.2 and Regulation 7.20, subsection 3.11.1.2. The changes to these rules replace a requirement for gasoline tank trucks to possess valid pressure vacuum test sticker with a requirement for specific vapor tightness testing and recordkeeping procedures, clarify rule applicability, and remove language stating that a pressure measuring device will be supplied by the District. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 4 office please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information.
IV. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve the revisions to the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP Regulation 6.21, Standard of Performance for Existing Gasoline Loading Facilities at Bulk Terminals, Version 3, and Regulation 7.20, Standard of Performance for New Gasoline Loading Facilities at Bulk Plants, Version 3, submitted on September 5, 2019, as discussed above.

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410k; 40 CFR 52.02a.
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPAs role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:14 Jan 21, 2021

Jkt 253001

Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993 and 13563 76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011;
Is not an Executive Order 13771 82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017 regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.;
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.;
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1955 Pub. L. 1044;
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in the Executive Order 13132 64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999;
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997;
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001;
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12d of the national Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 15 U.S.C. 272 note because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898
59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994. The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000, nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

PO 00000

Frm 00020

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

6591

Dated: December 11, 2020.
Mary Walker, Regional Administrator, Region 4.
FR Doc. 202100533 Filed 12121; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 656050P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
EPAR01OAR20200327; FRL10018
02-Region 1

Air Plan Approval; Maine;
Infrastructure State Implementation Plan Requirements for the 2015 Ozone Standard and Negative Declaration for the Oil and Gas Industry for the 2008
and 2015 Ozone Standards Environmental Protection Agency EPA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:

The Environmental Protection Agency EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan SIP
revision submitted by the State of Maine. This revision addresses the infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act CAA or Act for the 2015 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAAQS. Todays proposed action includes all elements of these infrastructure requirements except for the Good Neighbor or transport provisions, which will be addressed in a future action. The infrastructure requirements are designed to ensure that the structural components of each states air quality management program are adequate to meet the states responsibilities under the CAA.
EPA is also proposing to approve State of Maine submittals of amendments to Chapter 110, Ambient Air Quality Standards, and of statutory conflict-of-interest provisions in 38
Maine Revised Statutes Annotated MRSA Section 341A and 341C.
These two submittals support the states infrastructure submittal for the 2015
ozone NAAQS.
In addition, we are proposing to convert previous conditional approvals of the sub-element of section 110a2E that addresses State Board Requirements in Maines infrastructure SIPs for the 2008 ozone; 2008 lead Pb;
2010 nitrogen dioxide NO2; 2010
sulfur dioxide SO2; 1997, 2006, and 2012 fine particle PM2.5 NAAQS to full approvals. We are also proposing to convert to full approval previous conditional approvals of section 110a2A Emission limits and other control measures in Maines SUMMARY:

E:FRFM22JAP1.SGM

22JAP1